Celebrate Valentine’s Day With This Double Headed Sweater For You And Your Dog

Let’s face it, everyone knows that dogs are the very best thing that ever happened to us. No matter who we date or marry or love, our dogs are always going to be our first love. They’re there for us through thick and thin — they’re always there to lick our wounds (literally). And, because of this, they deserve to be celebrated like the good boys and girls they are.

So, this Valentine’s Day, why not get a sweater set that truly showcases how you feel about your puppy BFF — a double-headed sweater that you rock together. Available on Zulily, the sweater can be yours for only $39.99.

But, if you don’t want to rock the blue, why not grab one of these other adorable double-trouble sweaters for you and your furry boo. There’s an LGTBQ-friendly “love is love” sweater. Also, a “heart breaker” sweater in pink. And, our favorite, the “double trouble.”

Each sweater is $39.99 and if you order before January 31st, you’ll get it in time for a Valentine’s Day photoshoot for you and your puppy.

If you really want to wear it with another person (I mean, why would you), you totally can. But, wouldn’t you rather be attached to a dog all day? I know I would!

In Case You Didn’t Already Look Like A Fool During Winter Weather, You Can Now Buy Fuzzy ‘Nose Warmers’

When the cold weather rolls around, everyone knows it’s that time of year to look like a giant, poofy marshmallow every single time you leave your house. Aside from the oversized, overstuffed jackets, many of us who live in colder regions (shout out New York City where it is always brick) have to layer up with scarves, hats, gloves, and multiple shirts.
Continue reading In Case You Didn’t Already Look Like A Fool During Winter Weather, You Can Now Buy Fuzzy ‘Nose Warmers’

20 Reasons Why Leggings Are Pants

The age-old question that every girl struggles with at some point in her life: are leggings pants? According to Merriam-Webster, pants can be defined as “an outer garment covering each leg separately and usually extending from the waist to the ankle.” Hmm…sounds like leggings fit that description to me, so can we end this debate now? Leggings are clearly here to stay

However, I should make it clear that if these leggings are see-through, although they may still meet the definition of pants, they should not be worn as pants, come on now, use some common sense. And tan leggings…cuz those are just weird. 

1. Skinny jeans are just as tight as leggings, and people don’t argue that they’re not pants.

2. At least when people bend over in leggings, you don’t run the risk of seeing everything exposed like you could in jeans.

3. And at least you can bend over in leggings.

4. Jeans are almost impossible to move in, how can they be qualified as pants?

5. The definition of “pants” does not specify that they have to be a certain fabric, therefore, leggings count.

6. Sweatpants are considered pants, and leggings definitely look less sloppy.

7. Like, you can wear nice leggings to work or when you go out…but you definitely could not wear sweatpants.

8. Just because they’re comfy does not mean they can’t be pants.

9. You can wear them to the gym and they count as pants there…

10. …so how does that change when you leave the gym?

11. If you think it’s because they’re too tight, again: skinny. jeans

12. Besides, if you get distracted by how fitted leggings are, you should probably reevaluate your life.

13. Leggings don’t cause camel toe because they’re not pants; they cause camel toe because you’re not wearing underwear.

14. That’s your own fault.

15. They’re flattering.

16. On everyone.

17. Like, leggings are pants with built in spanx.

18. It’s amazing.

19. Audrey Hepburn wore them.

20 Case closed.

For more of Ashley’s writing, follow her on Facebook or Twitter.

Exit mobile version